Friday, July 9, 2010

PEOPLE OF THE GULF COAST: HISTORY YOU CAN USE


The People

of Santa Barbara

vs.

Big

Corporate

Oil

(A Cautionary Tale)

or, Who Has Power and Who Does Not in America


GULF COAST RESIDENTS TAKE HEED:

This 1969 history promises to teach 2010 much, and we do well to listen. A sociological thriller, a nail-biter, a roller coaster ride for the ethically conscious, with everything from the bitterly funny to the obscenely familiar. As a bonus, one is left with a more thorough and effective understanding when one is done; so such Evils may at long last belong to history alone.....




EXCERPTS:


One of the extraordinary attributes

of the Santa Barbara locale is the presence of a

technology establishment among the most sophis-

ticated in the country. Several officials of the

General Research Corporation (a local R & D

firm with experience in marine technology) initiat-

ed studies of the oil outflow and announced find-

ings of pollution volume at a "minimum" of ten

fold the Interior estimate.... Interior both refused

to alter its estimate or to reveal its method for

making estimates. Throughout the crisis, the

divergence of the estimates remained at about

ten fold.... The lowest estimate of all was

provided by an official of the Western Oil

and Gas Association, in a letter to

the Wall Street Journal. His estimate: "Probably

less than 100 gallons a day" (SBNP, August 5,

1969:A-1).


[snip]


The oil companies, through various public

relations officials, constantly minimized

the actual amount of damage and maximized

the effect of Union Oil's cleanup activity.

What surprised (and most irritated) the locals was

the fact that Interior statements implied the

same goal. Thus Hickel referred at a press con-

ference to the "recent" oil spill, providing the

impression that the oil spill was over, at a time

when freshly erupting oil was continuing to stain

local beaches. President Nixon appeared locally

to "inspect" the damage to beaches, and Interior

arranged for him to land his helicopter on a city

beach which had been cleaned thoroughly in the

days just before, but spared hitn a close-up of

much of the rest of the County shoreline which

continued to be covered with a thick coat of

crude oil. (The beach visited by Nixon has been

oil stained on many occasions subsequent to the

President's departure.) Secret servicemen kept

the placards and shouts of several hundred

demonstrators safely out of Presidential viewing

or hearing distance.


[snip]


Oil on feathers is ingested by birds,

continuous preening thus leads to death.

In what local and national authorities called a

hopeless task, two bird-cleaning centers were

established to cleanse feathers and otherwise

administer to damaged wild-fowl. (Oil money helped

to establish and supply these centers.)

Both spokesmen from Oil and the federal govern-

ment then adopted these centers as sources of

"data" on the extent of damage to wild-fowl.

Thus, the number of dead birds due to pollution

was computed on the basis of number of fatalities

at the wild-fowl centers.* This of course is pre-

posterous given the fact that dying birds are pro-

vided with very inefficient means of propelling

themselves to such designated places. The ob-

viousness of this dramatic understatement of

fatalities was never acknowledged by either Oil

or Interior—although noted in Santa Barbara.


[snip]


Several observers at the Channel Islands

(a national wildlife preserve containing one of the

country's largest colonies of sea animals) reported

sighting unusually large numbers of dead sea-

lion pups—on the oil stained shores of one of

the islands. Statement and counter-statement

followed with Oil's defenders arguing that the

animals were not dead at all—but only appeared

inert because they were sleeping.


[snip]


In correspondence with complaining

citizens, N. B. Livermore, Jr., of the Resources

Agency of California refers to the continuing oil

spill as "minor seepage" with "no major long-

term effect on the marine ecology."



[snip]


From the start, part of the shock of the oil spill

was that such a thing could happen in a country

with such sophisticated technology. The much

overworked phrase, "If we can send a man to the

moon . . ." was even more overworked in Santa

Barbara. When, in years previous, Santa Bar-

bara's elected officials had attempted to halt

the original sale of leases, "assurances" were

given from Interior that such an "accident" could

not occur, given the highly developed state of

the art. Not only did it occur, but the original

gusher of oil spewed forth completely out of

control for ten days and the continuing "seepage"

which followed it remains uncontrolled to the

present moment, seven months later. That the

government would embark upon so massive a

drilling program with such unsophisticated tech-

nologies, was striking indeed.


Further, not only were the technologies in-

adequate and the plans for stopping a leak,

should it occur, nonexistent, but the area in which

the drilling took place was known to be ultra-

hazardous from the outset. That is, drilling was

occurring on an ocean bottom known for its

extraordinary geological circumstances—porous

sands lacking a bedrock "ceiling" capable of con-

taining runaway oil and gas. Thus the continuing

leakage through the sands at various points above

the oil reservoir is unstoppable, and could have

been anticipated with the data known to all par-

ties involved.



The People of Santa Barbara vs. Big Corporate Oil (A Cautionary Tale) html

The People of Santa Barbara vs. Big Corporate Oil (A Cautionary Tale) pdf









Be seeing you.









Free Counter
Free Counter

No comments:

Post a Comment